91制片厂

You Have One Job: Compared to Multi-Tasking Workers, Soldier Ant Brains Small

An X-ray view of the heads of a worker and a soldier ant and the brains inside their head. The worker is much smaller with the brain filling more of its head.
3-D reconstructions of Eciton burchellii parvispinum heads with the brain and specialized structures highlighted. The head on the left is a worker, and the one on the right is a soldier. Courtesy of Sean O'Donnell.

Brains and brawn apparently don鈥檛 mix in army ant soldiers, a new study shows.

Led by  a professor in 91制片厂鈥檚 , a study  showed that while army ant soldiers have much larger bodies than their worker brethren, their brains are about the same size. Compared to their body size, then, the soldier ants have much smaller brains.

Why that occurs might have to do with how much energy it takes to develop and power brain tissue, according to O鈥橠onnell and his co-authors.

鈥淭he patterns we saw suggested natural selection favors efficient allocation of brain tissue, with the result of reduced investment in the behaviorally specialized soldiers,鈥 O鈥橠onnell said.

In many ants, individuals in a colony are divided into different 鈥渃astes,鈥 meaning group members play different roles to help the colony survive. O鈥橠onnell chose to study ants in the Eciton genus because of the stark body differences between castes; two of the major roles individuals take are workers or soldiers.

Soldier ants are larger, stronger and have powerful mandibles that work like pincers to fight off predators threatening the colony. That is effectively their only job.

Workers, meanwhile, have smaller bodies and mandibles more suited for grabbing and moving things. Their jobs are more varied, ranging from hunting and collecting food to tending to the young.

A bunch of ants moving on the forest floor.

As such, it follows that worker ants could have larger brains compared to their body size. With so many different tasks, they need the accompanying brainpower to accomplish them. 

Moreover, the study found that some specific parts of their brains 鈥 including the areas related to learning and smelling 鈥 were also comparatively larger in workers than soldiers. The soldiers鈥 brains could actually be described as a little more 鈥淪partan,鈥 with the special areas more trimmed down.

So, does that mean soldier ants are dumber than workers?

鈥淚鈥檓 not sure I鈥檇 say dumber so much as simpler,鈥 O鈥橠onnell said. 鈥淭hat鈥檚 our assumption, in a way, not our conclusion. Our idea was that soldiers鈥 simple behavior might require less brainpower.鈥

In this case, 鈥減ower鈥 is the important word. Since energy is so precious in ant colonies, they must conserve it to survive. And with brains needing so much energy to power, the researchers theorized that the ants with fewer tasks would be given less of a share of that energy.

Basically, the idea is that colonies are favored to spend their limited energy sources as prudently as possible, evolutionarily speaking.

鈥淐olony-dwelling animals potentially provide a unique window on how brains and behavior evolve,鈥 O鈥橠onnell said. 鈥淎n individual animal鈥檚 behavior has less relevance to itself, evolutionarily, and more relevance to its colony or group. Natural selection can occur by colony performance, and colony evolution may shape individual animals鈥 brain investment.鈥

Seeing this in action in Ecitonants provides a glimpse of how things may work for others.

鈥淭his leads to new predictions about patterns of brain investment in social animals,鈥 O鈥橠onnell said.

Top